The ECOWAS Court has dismissed a suit seeking N50 million in compensation for victims of the Abuja-Kaduna train attack, ruling that the case did not meet the necessary criteria for such a claim.
The suit was filed on behalf of the victims, who sought financial compensation for the trauma, injuries, and losses suffered during the March 2022 train attack, which resulted in casualties, abductions, and extensive damage.
The applicants argued that the Nigerian government had failed to adequately protect the train passengers and provide necessary security measures along the Abuja-Kaduna route, making it liable for the consequences of the attack.
The suit requested compensation to cover medical expenses, psychological treatment, and other support for the victims and their families.
In its ruling, the ECOWAS Court dismissed the compensation claim, stating that the plaintiffs did not present sufficient grounds under regional law to hold the government financially accountable for the attack.
The court cited jurisdictional limitations and emphasized that, while the incident was tragic, the case did not meet the legal standards required for such compensation claims within the ECOWAS framework.
The decision has sparked mixed reactions among the victims and the public. Victims’ advocates argue that the court’s dismissal adds to the frustration of those affected by the attack, as many have struggled with the financial and emotional toll of the incident.
They contend that the government should be held accountable for ensuring the safety of public transportation routes and that the lack of compensation reflects a broader issue of government responsibility in addressing security threats.
The Nigerian government, for its part, has expressed sympathy for the victims but noted that the dismissal aligns with legal precedents on such matters.
Following the attack, the government had already taken steps to enhance security along the Abuja-Kaduna corridor and improve response mechanisms to prevent future incidents. Officials have also reiterated their commitment to supporting the victims in other ways, though specifics have not been outlined.
For many, the ECOWAS Court’s dismissal is a reminder of the legal challenges involved in seeking government accountability for security-related incidents.
While the case may be closed, victims’ advocates plan to continue pressing for improved public safety measures and support for affected families, hoping to avoid similar tragedies in the future.
The ruling also underscores the complexity of legal recourse for victims of terrorism and insecurity in the region, highlighting the need for effective government policies to protect citizens and provide adequate post-incident support.
